abstract!!!
Mar. 26th, 2007 03:01 amEdit: Take 2
What is purity? Anthropologists have only started to investigate this question within the past century. Most work on this subject comes in the form of ethnographical studies of living cultures. But what about purity in the past? Can we study this from an archaeological perspective? Thus far, this is something that has rarely been attempted by archaeologists, although it certsainly is possible. This thesis addresses the problem of the lack of attention paid by archaeologists to purity, and attempts to rectify the situation by creating an archaeology of purity that can be used universally.
Beyond that, this thesis uses Judaism as a case study for the archaeology of purity. It addresses the question: what were purity beliefs and rituals in early Judaism, and how can we study this from an archaeological perspective? A look at the historical and archaeological evidence can provide us with a balanced picture. The historical evidence includes Jewish law, as well as extra-legal sources. The archaeological evidence is three miqva’ot (ritual baths) from ancient Palestine. After examining the evidence, we conclude that there is, in fact, heterodoxy in bathing practices in early Judaism.
How does that sound? It's 187 words, and the guidelines say the abstract should be 100-200 words. So this fits.
What is purity? Anthropologists have only started to investigate this question within the past century. Most work on this subject comes in the form of ethnographical studies of living cultures. But what about purity in the past? Can we study this from an archaeological perspective? Thus far, this is something that has rarely been attempted by archaeologists, although it certsainly is possible. This thesis addresses the problem of the lack of attention paid by archaeologists to purity, and attempts to rectify the situation by creating an archaeology of purity that can be used universally.
Beyond that, this thesis uses Judaism as a case study for the archaeology of purity. It addresses the question: what were purity beliefs and rituals in early Judaism, and how can we study this from an archaeological perspective? A look at the historical and archaeological evidence can provide us with a balanced picture. The historical evidence includes Jewish law, as well as extra-legal sources. The archaeological evidence is three miqva’ot (ritual baths) from ancient Palestine. After examining the evidence, we conclude that there is, in fact, heterodoxy in bathing practices in early Judaism.
How does that sound? It's 187 words, and the guidelines say the abstract should be 100-200 words. So this fits.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 09:45 am (UTC)Well done for fitting it all in!!
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:54 am (UTC)Nicely done, in the middle of an all-nighter, no less!
Ah, the spice of pressure and last-minutedness.
Good luck finishing!
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 01:15 pm (UTC)I myself have done the anthro thesis thing, so I know what you're going through. You seem to be off to a good start, though. With the writing. I assume you have already done the research bits.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 05:21 pm (UTC)What is purity? Anthropologists have only started to investigate this question within the past century. Most work on this subject comes in the form of ethnographical studies of living cultures. But HOW DID PEOPLE UNDERSTAND PURITY IN THE PAST? Can we study this from an archaeological perspective? Thus far, this is something that has rarely been attempted by archaeologists, although it certsainly is possible. This thesis addresses the [DELETED] lack of attention paid by archaeologists to purity, and attempts to rectify the situation by creating an archaeology of purity that can be used universally.
[DELETED] this thesis uses Judaism as a case study for the archaeology of purity. It addresses the question: what were purity beliefs and rituals in early Judaism, and how can we study this from an archaeological perspective? A look at the historical and archaeological evidence can provide us with a balanced picture. The historical evidence includes Jewish law, as well as extra-legal sources. The archaeological evidence is three miqva’ot (ritual baths) from ancient Palestine. After examining the evidence, we conclude that there is, in fact, heterodoxy in bathing practices in early Judaism.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 05:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-26 11:26 pm (UTC)Generally good, just one or two recs. It's been my experience that the overuse of rhetorical questions in an abstract is frowned upon. Here is the place to assert your conclusions, state the issues you're taking you, and what you prove. No ambiguity, no vagueness, no question. I'd particularly try and remove the "But" and "Beyond that" both of which read as awkward. Nice, but could be tightened up and polished. In general with an abstract, if you can delete words without losing meaning, get rid of em.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 12:48 am (UTC)I generally use rhetorical questions to sort of trick me into writing. They give me direction. In theory I should take them out afterwards. But it was major crunch time this afternoon.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-27 08:17 am (UTC)